Running Interference
Ok, so there is an argument out there that Russia and the US are both pushing Ukraine, with equal force, from different directions. My buddy John at postmodernclog.com responds to one icky example from Johnathan Steele at the Guardian by reminding us that there are 48 million Ukrainians who also tend to influence the direction of their country. (my two cents on the Steele article - calling old Ukrainian inspirational songs "nationalistic and secessionist songs from the anti-semitic years of the second world war" is like me calling "God Rest Ye Merry Gentleman" a song of religious dread from the crushing burden of working class poverty years in Britain. If you're going to try to tar the whole opposition as Jew-haters, but you don't have any material from the crowds or from the slogans, I suppose you have to resort to tenuous historical parallels, huh? But anyway, I've already nailed Steele here)
This posting is a catalogue of all the actions by the US and Russia that I can think of right now so you can compare and contrast for yourself.
1a) Putin has visited Ukraine 3 times since September, and had Yanukovych out to see him at least once. Putin visited once three days before round one for a veterans' day parade that was moved up a week and a half from veterans' day for unexplained reasons. (Aside from Putin, Yanukovych, and Lukashenko, there were few people in Kyiv able to see the Nov 6th Parade on Oct 28th - all pedestrians without identification were turned back by police and the central Metro station was closed.) Putin came again a week before round two.
1b) Bush has never visited Ukraine. In the lead up to the election, a number of current and former top US politicians visited Kyiv, including the elder George Bush, Wesley Clark, Henry Kissenger, and Donald Rumsfeld. All visited on the invitation of the current President's son-in-law, and pro-administration deputy, Victor Pinchuk. They repeated the statements of the US Congress (see 2b) calling for free and fair elections, and warning of consequences if elections are not free and fair. Senator McCain on behalf of IRI and Former Secretary of State Madelein Albright on behalf of NDI gave similar warnings about consequences, and suggested visa restrictions for Ukrainian officials found to have been complicit in fraud. The Russia Club, a group initiated by Yanukovych, Putin's Chief-of-Staff Medvedev, and Moscow spin doctor Gleb Pavlovsky, has accused the United States of meddling in Ukraine's internal affairs and cited Kissenger's visit as an example.
2a) Putin personally spoke well of Yanukovych on three nationwide Ukrainian channels during his visit to Ukraine before round one, saying: "The Yanukovych government managed to achieve not only a high pace of growth . . . It managed at the same time to concentrate financial resources on solving the main social tasks such as increasing pensions". [Financial Times] (Yanukovych doubled pensions, quintupling the budget, in a non-repeating "bonus" a month before round one of the election)
2b) George Bush said nice things about liberty in honor of an anniversary day at the Taras Shevchenko monument in Washington in July. The US Congress voted for resolutions in support of free and fair elections. Later individual politicians called for fair and transparent election, as stated above. Later Bush sent Senator Richard Lugar to observer the second round "not to be an advocate of either of the candidates, but to stress the need for a free and transparent process."
3a) The opposition claims that half of the $600 million Yanukovych spent on his campaign came from Russia, a large percentage of it from the state oil company Gazprom.
3b) No credible accusations have come from Russia about involvement
of US government or business financing in Yushchenko's campaign. In
fact, I haven't heard any such accusations at all, even from the
Russian Club.

Reader Comments (8)
I'm glad to have found your site, btw. It's always nice to see other RPCVs blogging about their country of service.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1028/p09s02-coop.html
Past U.S. support for similar situations also well known:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/ ukraine/story/0,15569,1360236,00.html
Russian advisers have mentioned U.S. influence:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20041128/ ap_on_re_eu/ukraine_elections
Nothing new here.
1) Why are you so interested in Ukraine?
2) Can you read and understand Russian or Ukrainian enough to translate it in English?
3) "It's always nice to see other RPCVs blogging about their country of service." What does that mean? Are you serving in the Ukraine? And what's RPCV?
4) Your coverage of Ukrainian elections is pretty extensive. Does writing on this website all day earns you money? If not, what financial support allows you to research, read, and write everything for this website (do you or your wife have a job that earns money or you live off savings?)
Thanks
Denis:
1) Cause I live here in Kyiv and was a Peace Corps volunteer so I worked with people here who are very progressive and active. And I edited news coverage of Ukraine for 8 months, and I just like this place. :)
2) I can read Russia well enough to translate to English, but not write well enough to do things the other way around
3) Sorry, RPCV = Returned Peace Corps Volunteer. Basically it is a Peace Corps volunteer who has finished his or her term of service.
4) Hehehe. I get a nice big warm sense of satisfaction. That's about it. For the monetary support, please see my "About Me" section. I edit for a software company and a non-profit newsletter to pay the bills.
Glad you find my coverage extensive!
You are a foreiner spending all your time (judging by the amount of your posts here)compaining for Ukrainian opposition.
Who pays for your living there?
The non-profit newsletter? What's the newletter, and who finance it?
It all fits very well with the point of the following article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/ukraine/story/0,15569,1360236,00.html
The bottom line: we have a lot of western agents trying to install a government of plutocrats instead of burocrats in Ukraine.
I wonder how it may help Ukrainean people?
And what's democratic in this process?
I must say, I'm also flattered. I've never had anybody sincerely think I was a secret agent before. It sounds very James Bond. But for the truth, I would very much suggest you go to my site section: About Me. I list my main employer there, Celenia, as well as my secondary employer Eastern European Monitor, a non-profit newsletter that covers what I would call non-profity issues. The most recent issue of the magazine they put out was on fashion and famine. If you want, send an email to me by clicking on my name, I can then put you in touch with my boss, and she can send you a copy!
You have an article from the Guardian I see. I also have an article, it is from the Washington Post. It is at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23721-2004Nov30.html.
Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians make for a lot of western agents. They generally do not get into the policy details so I don't know if they prefer plutocracy to bureaucracy, but they do dislike the election fraud. Do you deny that it happened, or deny that it was wrong?
The democratic part of this process is that it overturned a ruling in which the democratically elected president did not win. People fought against that and now, if the next round of the election is clean, then the winner will be elected by the people. That's the definition of democracy. It is also the answer to how this will help the Ukrainian people. If you would like, please read my next article, "Yushchenko for precedent" I describe the importance of this in more detail.